Manchester Arena Inquiry: Bomber ‘should have been identified as a threat’

114551891 mcrarenaattackcomposite210920
UK

Top row (left to right): Alison Howe, Martyn Hett, Lisa Lees, Courtney Boyle, Eilidh MacLeod, Elaine McIver, Georgina Callander, Jane Tweddle - Middle row (left to right): John Atkinson, Kelly Brewster, Liam Curry, Chloe Rutherford, Marcin Klis, Angelika Klis, Megan Hurley, Michelle Kiss - Bottom row (left to right): Nell Jones, Olivia Campbell-Hardy, Philip Tron, Saffie-Rose Roussos, Sorrell Leczkowski, Wendy Fawell

Family handouts

Manchester Arena suicide bomber Salman Abedi should have been identified as a threat on the night of the atrocity by those in charge of security, a public inquiry into the 2017 attack has found.

Inquiry chairman Sir John Saunders found there were missed opportunities to prevent the “devastating impact”.

He said it was likely Abedi would have detonated his device if confronted but “the loss of life and injury is highly likely to have been less”.

Twenty-two people died in the bombing.

Hundreds more were injured when Manchester-born Abedi, who was of Libyan descent, walked across the foyer of the arena and detonated the bomb at 22:31 BST on 22 May 2017.

The first of three reports published by the public inquiry, which began in September 2020, has levelled criticism at British Transport Police (BTP), the arena operators SMG, and their contracted security providers, Showsec.

Sir John said two teenage stewards did not react “as robustly and effectively as they should have” when a member of the public, Christopher Wild, raised his concerns about the bomber.

He said Mr Wild was “fobbed off”.

The inquiry chairman called this “the most striking missed opportunity”.

Armed Police officers at Manchester Arena

PA Media

Other key findings:

  • There was no BTP officer present in the foyer and “no satisfactory explanation” for this.
  • BTP officers bear personal responsibility for failing to follow clear instructions
  • Salman Abedi hid in a CCTV blindspot which had existed for a number of years. If addressed the attack could have been “disrupted or deterred or fewer people killed”
  • Counter terrorism training given to stewards was criticised and risk assessments by SMG and Showsec were said to be inadequate

A range of improvements have been recommended.

Most notably Sir John has supported the introduction of new “Protect Duty” legislation to place a duty on venue operators to consider and cater for the risk of terrorist attack.

This is named “Martyn’s Law” after 29-year-old Martyn Hett who was killed in the bombing.

An 18-week consultation into the legislation was launched in February.

Figen Murray, Martyn Hett’s mother, has called for the recommendations to be acted upon “so that no other families have to go through what we have”.

The report made it clear, she said, that “venue security needs to be improved to help prevent further terror attacks”.

She said she welcomed the recommendation which made it an obligation for venue owners to “ensure sufficient protection and preparation for any potential incident”.

Ms Murray added: “We should not have to live in fear and I am determined to make this law a reality.”

Presentational grey line

Why not follow BBC North West on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram? You can also send story ideas to northwest.newsonline@bbc.co.uk

Related Internet Links

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites.

Products You May Like

Articles You May Like

The ex-flight attendant who now leads the airline
Met sorry for broken promise to Baroness Lawrence
Rishi Sunak says first Rwanda asylum flights to take off in ’10-12 weeks’
Husband of ex-Post Office boss advised on IT ‘bug’
Can Yousaf survive as Scotland’s first minister?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.